Principal at Grabar Law Office.Joshua H. Grabar has extensive experience as counsel in complex commercial litigation in state and federal courts throughout the nation, with a particular concentration and emphasis in individual and class action litigation under state and federal antitrust laws, federal securities laws, and state consumer protection laws.Mr. Grabar has also represented plaintiffs and defendants in a broad range of other commercial litigation, including breach of contract litigation, litigation involving claims for coverage and indemnification under Directors and Officers liability insurance policies, disputes involving business torts and other unfair and deceptive business practices, claims involving alleged breach of fiduciary duty and misuse of corporate assets by corporate officers and directors, shareholder derivative suits, and claims involving private and public sector employees with respect to whistleblower protection laws.Mr. Grabar also advises individuals, business owners and corporations on matters concerning antitrust compliance, retention of antitrust claims and recoveries, and consumer protection law compliance issues.• AV Preeminent- Peer Rated for Highest Level of Professional Excellence by Martindale-Hubble. Recognized as having the highest ethical standing.• Selected in 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021 as one of Pennsylvania's Super Lawyers by Thompson Reuters' SuperLawyers publication, an honor received by no more than 5 percent of the lawyers in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.• Selected in 2010 and 2013 as one of Pennsylvania's Rising Stars by Thompson Reuters' SuperLawyers publication, an honor received by no more than 2.5 percent of the lawyers in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.• Selected Commercial Litigation Expert of the Year 2019 - Pennsylvania by Acquisition International• Guest Speaker, Delaware Valley Industrial Resource Center, “The Three-Legged Stool of Antitrust Class Action Litigation.”• Licensed Public Adjuster, Pennsylvania and New Jersey.• Representative cases include:In re Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation, l:19-cv-00385 (W.D.N.Y.)Elton v. Musk, et al., 2018-0749 (Del. Ct. Ch.)In Re: Diisocyanates Antitrust Litigation, 2:18-mc-01001-DWA (W.D.Pa.)In re: Railway Industry Employee No-Poach Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 2850 (W.D.Pa.)In re Inductors Antitrust Litigaltion,5:18-cv-00198 (EJD) (N.D. Cal.)Philadelphia Federation of Teachers Health and Welfare Fund V. Allergan, Inc.,1:17-CV-07377 (E.D.N.Y.) In reEquifax, Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation,1:17-md-2800-TWT (N.D. Ga.)In re: German Automotive Manufacturers Antitrust Litig., 3:17-md-02796-CRB (N.D. Cal.)In re: Generic Pharmaceuticals Pricing Antitrust Litig., 2:16-MD-2724-CMR (E.D.PA.)In re: Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litig., 2:13-CV-20000 (N.D. Ala.)In re: Cathode Ray Tube Antitrust Litig., 3:07-cv-05944 (N.D. Cal.) (recoveries exceeding $175 million).In re: Urethane Antitrust Litig., 2:04-MD-1616 (D. Kan.) (recoveries exceeding $935 million. Jury verdict against remaining defendant of $400 million trebled to $1.06 billion and settled for $835 million pending petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court).In re: Steel Antitrust Litig., 08-cv-5214 (N.D. Ill.) (antitrust class action alleging market allocation and supply restriction of steel by the world’s major manufacturers of steel, recoveries exceeding $163 million).In re: EPDM Antitrust Litig.,MDL No. 1542 (D. Conn.) (recoveries exceeding $100 million).In re: Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litig., 05-CV-666 (E.D. Pa) (recoveries exceeding $97 million).Alco Industries, Inc. v. DuPont Dow Elastomers, LLC, 1:04 CV 00588 (D.D.C.) (recoveries exceeding$36 million).In re Polychloroprene Rubber (CR) Antitrust Litig., 3:05-MD-01642 (D. Conn.) (recoveries exceeding $15 million).In re Methyl Methacrylate (MMA) Antitrust Litig., 2:06-MD-01768 (E.D. Pa.) (recoveries exceeding$15 million).In re Mercedes-Benz Antitrust Litig., 99-CV-431 (AMW) (D.N.J.) (recoveries exceeding $17 million).In re Rubber Chemicals Antitrust Litig., 03-CV-1496 (N.D. Cal.) (recoveries exceeding $250 million).Fears, et al. v. Wilhelmina Model Agency, Inc., et al., 02-CV-4911 (S.D.N.Y.) (recoveries exceeding$23 million).