First Admitted: 1993, Massachusetts

Professional Webpage: https://www.sadis.com/attorneys/jennifer-rossan

Bar/Professional Activity:

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Massachusetts
New York

Special Licenses/Certifications:

United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York

Honors/Awards:

Sadis & Goldberg LLP is pleased to announce that Jennifer Rossan has been selected for Lawyer Monthly Women in Law 2016 Awards. Ms. Rossan has been selected for her work in the Litigation sector. This is the first annual Women in Law Awards, celebrating and highlighting the achievements of women in the legal profession across the globe. Lawyer Monthly canvassed the opinions of readers based on a 6 point list of criteria. For more information or to read how the research was conducted, please go to www.lawyer-monthly.com, Women in Law Awards, Lawyer Monthly, 2016, Lawyer Monthly Women in Law 2016 Awards, Lawyer Monthly, 2016
“Leading Women Lawyers in New York City,” Crain’s New York Business, 2018
New York Metro Super Lawyer, New York Metro Super Lawyer Magazine 2014 – 2017
Sadis & Goldberg LLP is pleased to announce that Jennifer Rossan has been selected for Lawyer Monthly Women in Law 2014 Awards. Ms. Rossan has been selected for her work in the Litigation sector. This is the first annual Women in Law Awards, celebrating and highlighting the achievements of women in the legal profession across the globe. Lawyer Monthly canvassed the opinions of readers based on a 6 point list of criteria. For more information or to read how the research was conducted, please go to www.lawyer-monthly.com, Women in Law Awards, Lawyer Monthly, 2014

Educational Background:

University of Michigan, Bachelor of Arts, 1990
Boston University School of Law (J.D.; International Law Journal), 1993

Scholarly Lectures/Writings:

Hedge Fund Law Report, Co-Author, Sullivan v. Harnisch and SEC Proposed Whistleblower Rules Bolster Internal Compliance Programs While Creating Catch-22 for Compliance Officers, 2011
On December 10, 2014, the Second Circuit issued a decision reversing the insider trading convictions of Todd Newman and Anthony Chiasson and ordering the dismissal of their indictments with prejudice. The decision has been the talk of the legal community and Wall Street, as it represents a rare loss for U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in his signature insider trading crackdown - indeed it appears to represent just his second and third losses after the Rengan Rajaratnam trial. This decision is likely to give rise to a number of other reversals of convictions, thereby representing a serious set-back for the U.S. Attorney's Office, and, by logical extension, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("S.E.C."), Co-Author, Insider Trading After the Newman Decision, 2014
Employers should give careful consideration to the inclusion of non-competition provisions in employment agreements for low-level employees. The New York Attorney General (the "AG") recently announced that it settled investigations with two companies over their use of non-compete provisions in employment agreements for low-level employees. Policing non-compete provisions is a new regulatory frontier for the AG and it is flexing its regulatory muscle pursuant to § 63 (12) of New York's Executive Law, which provides the AG with authority to enjoin businesses from utilizing "unconscionable contractual provisions.", Co-Author, A Cautionary Tale in the Use of Non-Compete Agreements, 2016

Firm News (Newsletters):

INSIDER TRADING AFTER THE NEWMAN DECISION

Jennifer Rossan

Jennifer Rossan

Client Reviews

Add a Review